Planning Committee approves The Planning Act, has not been demonstrated and staff consider the application to be... 10-0

A demolition permit application was submitted to the Building Division. An application for Site Plan Approval for redevelopment had not been submitted.

The motion, as recorded in the minutes:

Demolition Permit – 3044 Regional Road 56, Glanbrook (Ward 11) (i) (Nann/Cooper) That Report PED26114, dated June 16, 2026, respecting Demolition Permit – 3044 Regional Road 56, Glanbrook (Ward 11), be received and the recommendations contained therein be approved: (a) That the request to issue a demolition permit for 3044 Regional Road 56, Glanbrook be denied as compliance with Section 6 of the Demolition Control By-law 22-101, pursuant to Section 33 The Planning Act, has not been demonstrated and staff consider the application to be premature. Councillor Nann withdrew the above Motion to allow another member to move an alternative. (ii) (Tadeson/Cooper) That Report PED26114, dated June 16, 2026, respecting Demolition Permit – 3044 Regional Road 56, Glanbrook (Ward 11), be received and the alternative recommendations in the Report be approved, as follows: (a) That the request to issue a demolition permit for 3044 Regional Road 56, Glanbrook be authorized as compliance with Section 6 of the Demolition Control By-law 22-101, pursuant to Section 33 The Planning Act, has not been demonstrated and staff consider the application to be premature.

Every figure above comes from the official minutes and the recorded vote they contain. The roll call shows how each member voted.

How this report was made: a language model drafted it from 4 claims extracted verbatim from the meeting’s own documents, and a second model checked every sentence against those claims. Nothing outside the cited documents reaches this page. The vote record above is parsed directly from the minutes and is not drafted.